Legal Opinion

City of Burlington v. Department of Employment & Training

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 9, 1987No. Nos. 84-527, 84-528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The City of Burlington and the Burlington Electric Department (referred to collectively herein as appellant) appeal from two decisions of the Vermont Employment Security Board (Board) that the Unemployment Compensation Division had properly charged the accounts of the appellant for benefits paid to two claimants. We reverse and remand.

Appellant is a “reimbursable employer” under 21 V.S.A. § 1321(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (21 V.S.A. ch. 17). As such, it is not required to make contributions to the unemployment compensation fund, but must reimburse the fund for “benefits paid,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. TierneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  2. Graves v. MeystrikDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977
  3. Riley v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Brown v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. TeachoutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holton v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Chittenden County Sheriff's Department v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  3. Windham County Sheriff's Department v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. In re Ahmed M. Hamid-AhmedSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  5. Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API