Hartsville Cotton Mill v. South Carolina Employment Security Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The following is the order of
Judge Lewis:
This action was instituted by the plaintiff-employer under Section 6(i) of the South Carolina Unemployment Compensation Law, Section 7035-86 (i) of the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1942, and is in the nature of an appeal from a decision of the South Carolina Employment Security Commission.
From the record before me the following facts appear. The defendant, Doris T. Lambert, was employed by The Hartsville Cotton Mill for a period of approximately five months prior to January 22, 1951, on which date she was discharged for irregular attendance. Mrs.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mills v. South Carolina Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berkoff v. HasegawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- City of Burlington v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.