Legal Opinion
Walker v. Blue Cross of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1992No. A052482PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Procedural Background
Appellant Carretha Walker’s amended complaint for wrongful termination against her former employer, respondent Blue Cross of California (hereinafter Blue Cross), alleged causes of action for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, intentional infliction of emotional distress, 1 and discrimination in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (hereinafter FEHA), Government Code section 12900 2 et seq. Blue Cross filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion and the opposition were supported by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Miller v. Bechtel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Scott v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.