Legal Opinion

In re the Reinstatement of Quintana

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1991No. 16079Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter is before the court following disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to the Rules Governing Discipline, SCRA 1986, 17-101 to -316 (Repl.Pamp. 1988 & Cum.Supp.1990), wherein suspended attorney Elias N. Quintana, Jr. seeks reinstatement to the practice of law. We agree with the Disciplinary Board that Quintana has not demonstrated clearly and convincingly, as required under Rule 17-214(D), that he presently has the moral qualifications and is once again fit to resume the practice of law or that his resumption of practice would pose no detriment to the integrity and…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of EliasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Catalano v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. In re QuintanaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Matter of QuintanaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API