Legal Opinion

Gengenbach v. Willow Grove Park Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1924No. Appeals, Nos. 294 and 295PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiffs, father and son, brought suit to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. The injury complained of occurred in Montgomery County, where the corporation maintains its principal office. The suits were brought in Philadelphia, and defendant presented a petition to set aside the service there made on the president of the Willow Grove Park Company, it being averred the court of Montgomery County alone had jurisdiction to decide the matter in controversy. An answer was filed to the rule granted to set aside the service,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. DeHaas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Mazurek v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Gilbert v. Lebanon Valley Street RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Lobb v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Walde v. Bowers Bat. Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API