Legal Opinion

Walde v. Bowers Bat. Mfg. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1939No. Appeal, 342PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

This appeal is from an order of the court below discharging a rule to show cause why the service on defendant of a writ of summons in assumpsit should not be set aside. Defendant is a domestic corporation with its principal place of business in Berks County, but the present suit was commenced in Philadelphia and service was effected there at a place alleged by plaintiff to be a branch office of defendant.

Defendant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of storage batteries, its plant being in Reading. It maintains at 1724-26 Fairmount Avenue, Philadelphia, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. DeHaas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Gengenbach v. Willow Grove Park Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Gilbert v. Lebanon Valley Street RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Lobb v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Gear Wks. v. Read mach.co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Lallone v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948
  3. Shoffner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Everett v. Robbins, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1951
  5. Kaschak v. Greek Catholic Union of U. S. A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API