Legal Opinion

Campau v. Michell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facta are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This cause was tried in the court below without a jury, and the following facts found:

“ 1. That the defendant leased of plaintiff on the 8th day of February, 1889, for the period of three years, two brick stores, numbers 32 and 34 Cadillac Square, city of Detroit, and county of Wayne, said term beginning May 1, 1889, the rent being paid in advance in equal monthly installments of 1258.33, payable on the 1st day of each month during the term of the lease; and at the end of the term second party agreed peaceably to leave, surrender/and yield up said premises to the party of the first part, his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haynes v. . AldrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Scott v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Adler v. MendelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lubetkin v. Henry Elias Brewing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mason v. Wierengo's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Landsberg v. Tivoli Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Schneider v. BatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Abarca Sanfeliz Vda. de Gumersindo Suárez v. Bank of Nova ScotiaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
  5. Hoffman v. WillitsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API