Adler v. Mendelson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Superior Court of MihoauTeee County. Action to recover rent. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. For the appellant it was contended that he had a right to treat the respondent remaining in occupation of the premises after the expiration of the term created by the written lease, as his tenant from year to year.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Superior Court of MihoauTeee County. Action to recover rent. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. For the appellant it was contended that he had a right to treat the respondent remaining in occupation of the premises after the expiration of the term created by the written lease, as his tenant from year to year. A tenant’s refusal to renew his lease, and his notice that he will leave at the expiration of the term, do not release him from liability as a tenant from year to year. It is not promising, but going, that discharges the tenant. E. S. sec. 2187; Schuyler v.…
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is an action brought by the appellant to recover of the respondent rent for the premises described in the complaint, which is alleged to have accrued after *466the 1st day of May, 1888. The evidence shows that the premises had been occupied by.the respondent as the tenant of the appellant, under a written lease for five years, commencing on the 1st of May-, 1883, and ending on the 1st of May, 1888. The appellant claims to recover for the rent after the 1st of May, 1888, on the ground that the respondent did not deliver up the possession of said premises to the plaintiff at the expiration of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Campau v. MichellMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Hoffman v. WillitsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916