Legal Opinion

Cary v. Everett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Cass; O’Hara, J. Trover by Abram Cary and another against Omer E. Everett and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of trover for the recovery of the value of 400 bushels of wheat. Defendants pleaded the general issue. It appears that the plaintiffs, on September 16, 1890, commenced suit in attachment before a justice of the peace against Lewis J. Hadden, and on the same day attached 20 acres of wheat that had been sown by Hadden on his wife’s farm, in Wayne township, Casscounty, and upon which Hadden resided. No personal service of the attachment was had upon the defendant, but the officer having the Avrit filed a notice in the town clerk’s office that he had attached the wheat on that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Langtry v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fletcher v. MorrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ames v. ParrottNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Rameau v. ValleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Knack v. BerlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API