Rameau v. Valley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sessions, J. Replevin in justice’s court by William Rameau against Edward F. Yalley and Ralph Peterson. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appealed to the circuit court where judgment for nominal damages was entered against defendant Peterson, and as to defendant Yalley judgment of no cause of action was entered. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
This was a replevin case commenced in justice’s court by plaintiff against defendants to obtain possession of a certain ferry scow and cable used to ferry across the Muskegon river, in Muskegon county, where a bridge had formerly been located. From a judgment rendered in justice’s court an appeal was taken to the Muskegon circuit court, where the case was tried before the court without a jury.
The following findings of fact and conclusions of law in the case were made and filed by the court April 18, 1910:
“ Findings of Fact and Law.
“(1) That the defendant, Edward Valley, commenced an action in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stafford v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Galvin v. Galvin Brass & Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Wynkoop v. Grand Traverse Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Davison v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Langtry v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. GoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Curry v. ShearsMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Gervickes v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- In re Central Stamping & Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948
- International Harvester Co. of America v. EmbodyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.