Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Carrigan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 23, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

This bar discipline case was reserved and reported to the full bench by a single justice. The Board of Bar Overseers (board) filed an information in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk recommending that the respondent, Owen R. Carrigan, be suspended from the practice of law for one year for his intentional misuse of client funds. Bar counsel concurs with this recommendation. The respondent, however, argues that there were errors of law in the findings adopted by the board. The respondent further claims that the discipline recommended in his case is excessive as compared to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of AlterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. In the Matter of the Discipline of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. In the Matter of DawkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. In the Matter of BryanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. In the Matter of DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re SchoepferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. In re BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. In re WattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. In re MurrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Giles v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API