Legal Opinion

Close v. Gorman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint to add medical malpractice causes of action alleging that John F. Gorman, M.D. (defendant) failed to diagnose the breast cancer of Joan M. Close (plaintiff) in a timely manner and that he is vicariously liable for the interpretation of her mammograms in 1992 and 1994 by defendant radiologists. Contrary to *1014defendant’s contention, plaintiffs established the applicability of the continuous treatment doctrine, thereby tolling the Statute of Limitations for medical…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. MaherNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Smith v. BessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Pace v. CaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Axelrod v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cherise v. BraffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Prinz-Schwartz v. LevitanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Dolce v. PowalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API