Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s renewed motion for summary judgment, following the Federal Circuit’s reversal of the court’s imposition of discovery sanctions against defendant. The court must now decide, some twenty years after the inception of the contract, whether plaintiff’s claim for an equitable adjustment should be forfeited on the ground that plaintiff’s claim was fraudulent. The issues presented are: (i) whether the court may ignore the factual findings of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), rendered after a sixty-nine day…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Emiabata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Phillips/May Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Ch2m Hill Hanford Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Pinero v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012