Legal Opinion

Pauk v. Pauk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1996PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals (1) as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.H.O.), dated April 11, 1994, as, after a nonjury trial, (a) ordered him to pay the plaintiff wife $47,115 in attorneys fees, (b) awarded him only 25% of the value of the plaintiff’s New York State Teachers Pension as of the date of the judgment, (c) awarded the plaintiff 50% of the "highest balance in the defendant’s 403(b) plan from the date of marriage until the date of this judgment”, (d) ordered him to pay…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. MATTER OF CASSANO v. CassanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McLoughlin v. McLoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Frei v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Litvak v. LitvakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Allen v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Curry v. CurryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API