Legal Opinion

Kay v. Bruno

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 26, 1985No. Civ. 84-679-DPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DEVINE, Chief Judge.

A Floridian by residence, an attorney by profession, and Democratic in politics, plaintiff Richard B. Kay sought his party’s 1984 presidential nomination. In the course of such quest, he attended in October 1983 a New Hampshire political gathering sponsored by Democrats. The events which overtook him in the course of such visit gave birth to the instant litigation.

Named as defendants are the New Hampshire Democratic Party (“Party”), and George Bruno, Ted N. Goble, Stephanie Powers, and Robert E. Raiche, who are described as holding varied positions with respect to the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Rainbow FamilyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1988
  2. Bryant v. NoetherDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Greenberg v. MynczyworDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987
  4. King v. Friends of AyotteDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  5. Valenti v. Pennsylvania Democratic State CommitteeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API