Legal Opinion

Cutler v. Kodiak Island Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2012No. S-14215PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Boroughs are statutorily authorized to provide and charge residents for garbage-collection services. The primary issue in this appeal is whether boroughs also have the implied or incidental authority to record *417a real property lien to secure payment of garbage-collection fees. We conclude they do not have that authority.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 2007 Virgilio and Rosemarie Sabado hired Roger David to tear down a fire-damaged house on their property in Kodiak. In September David opened a commercial garbage account with the Kodiak Island Borough (Borough)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Hooper Bay v. BunyanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Barber v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Johnson v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation v. MatthewsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  5. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation v. MatthewsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API