Legal Opinion

TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation v. Matthews

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided October 4, 2022No. 3:16-cv-00136Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA TD AMERITRADE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:16-cv-00136-SLG JAMES RICHARD MATTHEWS, Defendant. ORDER RE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES Before the Court at Docket 249 is Plaintiffs’ TD Ameritrade Inc., TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, TD Ameritrade IP Company, Inc. and TD Ameritrade Services Company, Inc. (TD Ameritrade) motion for attorneys’ fees. Defendant James Richard Mathews responded in opposition at Docket 251 and TD Ameritrade replied at Docket 252. TD Ameritrade requests that the Court award $42,429.55 in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Cutler v. Kodiak Island BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API