Legal Opinion

Buckel v. Auer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1918No. 9,648PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Elkhart Circuit Court; James S. Drake, Judge. Action by Mary Buckel and others against Rupert Auer and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, C. J.

Judgment was rendered against appellants by reason of their election not to plead further on the overruling of their demurrers filed to the *322second, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh paragraphs of answer. These rulings are assigned as error.

Appellants are heirs at law of Creszentia Auer, deceased, appellants Mary Buckel, Frances Peak, Amelia Toepp and Joseph C. Lauber being children of her first marriage, and the other appellants George Lauber, Jr., and Amanda Lauber being children of her deceased son, George Lauber, who died before her decease.

Appellees other than PuShane,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bryan v. UlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Eve v. LouisIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamer v. City of HuntingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Rickes v. RickesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Christlieb v. ChristliebIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Weil v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Weidler v. FloranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API