Legal Opinion

State ex rel. May v. Hall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1909No. 21,412PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom Pulaski Circuit Court; Francis J. Vurpillat, Judge. Quo warranto by The State of Indiana, on the relation of William May, against Plarry Hall. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

This is a statutory action by information, in the nature of quo warranto, to oust appellee from the office of road supervisor in district No. 1, Pranklin township, Pulaski county.

Errors have been assigned upon the overruling of appellant’s demurrers to the first, second and third paragraphs of answer.

The first paragraph of answer alleged that at the time of the election held on December —, 1907, the relator was the qualified and acting supervisor of said road district; that at said election he and appellee were opposing candidates for the office; that each received the same number of legal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Clifford v. McMullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Larrance v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Williams v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Youngblood v. MarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Weil v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Davisson v. HillisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API