Lungstrum v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from defects in a highway. Plaintiff appeals from the order sustaining a general demurrer to her petition. We shall refer to appellant as plaintiff and to the defendant state highway commission as the commission.
Plaintiff devotes a considerable portion of her brief to the contention her petition clearly describes a defect. The demurrer appears to have been sustained on other grounds. We, therefore, shall first examine the petition relative to the issues on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Gorges v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Cunningham v. Township of ClaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Thummel v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Board of Township TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Sanders v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Schroder v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Cronin v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Continental Insurance v. WindleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.