Legal Opinion

Lungstrum v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 13, 1954No. 39,467PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from defects in a highway. Plaintiff appeals from the order sustaining a general demurrer to her petition. We shall refer to appellant as plaintiff and to the defendant state highway commission as the commission.

Plaintiff devotes a considerable portion of her brief to the contention her petition clearly describes a defect. The demurrer appears to have been sustained on other grounds. We, therefore, shall first examine the petition relative to the issues on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. Gorges v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Cunningham v. Township of ClaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Thummel v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Board of Township TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Sanders v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Schroder v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Cronin v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Continental Insurance v. WindleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API