Cronin v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, C. J.:
These are separate actions against the State Highway Commission by John and Jean Cronin to recover damages for personal injuries and property loss sustained in a single accident, allegedly caused by a defect in a State Highway. Demurrers to the respective petitions, based on the ground those pleadings did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, were overruled in the court below and the Highway Commission perfected appeals from such rulings. Thereupon, it appearing that they presented a common question for decision, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Houdashelt v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Phillips v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Shields v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Sheen v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Lungstrum v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hampton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Brown v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Schroder v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Brown v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Martin v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.