Legal Opinion

Dunbar Armored, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 2, 1999No. Nos. 98-4067, 99-1046PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

We are asked to review and enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) charging Dunbar Armored, Inc. (“Dunbar”) with violating Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “Act”), U.S.C. § 158(a)(5) and (1), by refusing to bargain with the United Plant Guard Workers of America (“Union”), the certified representative of a unit of Dunbar employees. Dunbar admits refusing to bargain, but insists that the Board’s unit determination was inappropriately narrow because it consisted of employees at only one of Dunbar’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. American Hospital Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Winnebago Television Corporation D/B/A Wtvo-TvCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Roadmaster Corporation, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunbar Armored, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, and International Union, United Plant Guard Workers of America, Intervening Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API