Legal Opinion

Department of Social & Health Services v. Hileman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 15, 2005No. 56137-5-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 In any legal proceeding, the parties are entitled to procedural fairness. This includes, at minimum, notice and the opportunity to be heard. In this case, the trial court dismissed a contested dependency action on the basis of the father’s oral motion to dismiss during a shelter care hearing. The motion was made without notice, and was granted without any opportunity for the Department of Social and Health Services (the Department) to be heard. We reverse, vacate the dismissal, and remand.

Ellington, A.C.J.

FACTS

f 2 R.H. is a nine-year-old boy who has been suicidal. He has displayed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. In Re the Welfare of BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API