Legal Opinion

Frank Maddox v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1958No. 17132PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

The question presented here is whether an action by his next of kin for damages arising from injury to and death of Nathan Maddox can be maintained as a tort action against one not his employer, or whether the exclusive remedy lay under the Louisiana Compensation Act. The trial court held that said Act provided the sole remedy, and granted appellee’s motion to dismiss, treated as a motion for summary judgment. This appeal challenges the correctness of that judgment.

The City of Shreveport, engaged in expanding its facilities for furnishing water to its inhabitants,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. B & G CRANE SERVICE v. Thomas W. Hooley & SonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. Conley v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  4. Isthmian S. S. Co. Of Delaware v. OlivieriCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Bussie v. FantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATIONLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. L.E. Eguia v. Joyce TompkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Julius E. Kern v. Tri-State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. F. S. Bowen Electric Co., Inc. v. J. D. Hedin Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  5. Midland Engineering Co. v. John A. Hall Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API