Legal Opinion

Sieling v. State Roads Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 18, 1931No. [Nos. 93, 94, October Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

We have here two appeals, one from an order overruling the appellants’ (cross-defendants’) demurrer to the appellees’ cross-bill, the other from an order granting the appellees a preliminary injunction on their cross-bill restraining the appellants from interfering with the improvement of the state road known as the Baltimore-Washington Boulevard in the town of Laurel.

The appellants filed a bill wherein they alleged that Anna A. Sieling held the legal title and John H. Sieling had an equitable interest in excess of the value of $20 (Code, art. 3 6, sec. 109) in certain lots “abutting on a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. White v. FlannigainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  2. McCormick v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Hooper v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Ruhe v. RuheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Baldwin v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beach v. North Chesapeake Beach Land & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. McCawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Montgomery County v. BhattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Diven v. SielingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. McCawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API