Diven v. Sieling
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
We are asked in tbis appeal to reverse tbe decree of tbe chancellor by wbicb tbe appellants’ bill of complaint was dismissed. After carefully considering tbe rather voluminous testimony, our conclusion is in full accord with tbe chancellor’s decree, and tbe same must be affirmed. There were a number of exceptions reserved to rulings on evidence by tbe respective parties. At tbe close of tbe whole testimony tbe chancellor reviewed tbe testimony admitted subject to exception, as well as all other rulings, wbicb review resulted in practically all of tbe rulings being against tbe appellee and in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Dorsey v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1819
- Hollida v. ShoopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Beachey v. HeipleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Zimmerman v. HullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.