Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Cohen
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 2006No. 04-CV-33PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
Herbert Copeland appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to the appellees on his breach of contract claim. 1 The trial court found that Mr. Copeland failed to present sufficient evidence to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact. We agree with Mr. Copeland that the record contains sufficient evidence to establish triable issues of fact. Therefore, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand the case for trial.
I
On April 1, 1998, the parties entered into a lease for commercial property (“Lease”) located at 1906 14th Street, N.W. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Washington Post Company v. Eugene J. KeoghCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- McCoy v. Quadrangle Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mark Keshishian & Sons, Inc. v. Washington Square, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hackney v. Morelite ConstructionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Minmar Builders, Inc. v. Beltway Excavators, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parker v. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Island Development Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- New Media Strategies, Inc. v. Pulpfree, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008