Legal Opinion

Nikolous v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1988No. CV-87-0095-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

Defendants ask us to reverse the trial court’s dismissal of their third-party complaint. The question before us is whether a tort defendant can implead a third party who eventually may become liable to the defendant for contribution under the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act, A.R.S. § 12-2501 et seq. We granted review to resolve this issue of first impression. Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S.; Rule 8(b), Ariz.R.P.Spec.Act., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Markey v. SkogNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SeidelArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Holmes v. Hoemako HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Heinemann v. HallumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Schurgin v. Amfac Electric Distribution Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Yates Exploration, Inc. v. Valley Improvement Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hyster Co. v. DavidDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API