Legal Opinion

Heinemann v. Hallum

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 16, 2006No. 05-876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

Appellants Joseph Heinemann and Meribeth Heinemann appeal from the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Elaine Hallum. They assert that the circuit court erred in two respects: (1) in finding that Arkansas Code Annotated § 28-53-110(d) (Repl. 2004) served to bar their contribution action against Ms. Hallum; (2) in granting summary judgment because material questions of fact existed. We reverse the circuit court on the first point and remand the matter for further proceedings.

Onjune 18,1999, Sadie Schoenfield died, leaving one-third of her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Cole v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stromwall v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Benton County v. Overland Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. J-McDaniel Construction Co. v. Dale E. Peters Plumbing Ltd.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Wynne-Ark., Inc., D/B/A Kelley's Restaurant v. Richard Baughn ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Bonds v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API