State v. Knox
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Karpinski, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, William Knox, appeals from the judgment of the trial court which imposed a suspended sentence of eighteen months’ incarceration, in addition to a fine of $1,500, after defendant pled guilty to one count of drug abuse. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by (1) failing to inquire whether defendant was indigent before imposing a mandatory fine and (2) threatening to impose jail time as opposed to the monetary fine. These arguments are without merit, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The relevant facts follow.
On July 28,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PolickOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. LefeverOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. GutierrezOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. PendletonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SanchezOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. CruzOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. Dansby-EastOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. ZsigrayOhio Court of Appeals · 2021