Legal Opinion

State v. Gutierrez

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1994No. 93CA005661PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cook, Judge.

Francisco Gutierrez (“Gutierrez”) appeals his convictions of drug abuse and possession of drug paraphernalia, arguing that the state produced insufficient evidence to support the convictions. He also asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the mandatory fines for these offenses. We affirm in part because there was sufficient evidence supporting the convictions. We reverse and remand in part because, given the state of the record, the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the mandatory fines.

On February 28, 1993, Lorain police officers were dispatched…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. CravensOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GipsonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. GipsonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BrinkmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. KnoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. Cain, Unpublished Decision (4-10-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API