Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Beltrami Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 14, 1982No. 81-931PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
Frances Taylor, complainant-respondent, filed a complaint with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission) alleging that a construction deposit policy of Beltra-mi Electric Cooperative, Inc., (Beltrami Electric), appellant, was discriminatory. The Commission revoked the policy as unreasonably discriminatory and permitted Beltrami Electric to file with the Commission within 90 days a proposal for a new policy with supporting data. Beltrami Electric, contesting the jurisdiction of the Commission and asserting that its policy was reasonable and not discriminatory,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power CooperativeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State ex rel. Mason v. Consumers Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by19 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.