Legal Opinion

Deel v. Rizak

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 7, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-249PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs 1 have brought this civil action, based on diversity of citizenship, against the defendants 2 seeking to recover damages for injuries they allegedly sustained when an automobile driven in an allegedly negligent manner by Elise M. Rizak collided with plaintiffs’ automobile in Newark, Delaware, on July 7, 1976.

The defendants, pointing to the Delaware no-fault insurance statute, have asserted an affirmative defense that the plaintiffs may not recover special damages from defendants. See, 21 Del.C. § 2118. (Docket Item 1, par. 12). The parties have moved…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. KrongoldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  2. C. v. C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. DeVincentis v. Maryland Casualty CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Wilmington Housing Authority v. Greater St. John Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  5. Graffagnino v. Amoco Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nationwide Insurance v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  2. Read v. HoffeckerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Rutgers Cas. Ins. v. State FarmNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. DiIenno v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
  5. Green v. Budget Rent A Car Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API