DiIenno v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
On June 24, 1985, the plaintiffs, Robert M. Dilenno and Catherine L. Dilenno, both citizens of Pennsylvania, filed this action against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”), an Ohio corporation, alleging that Nationwide is liable for Delaware’s personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits to Robert M. Dilenno in the amount of $15,000 and to Catherine Dilenno in the amount of $11,231.45, and that the plaintiffs are collectively entitled to underinsured motorists benefits from the defendant in the amount of $100,000. (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 1.) 1 As an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pajewski v. PerrySupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KennerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KennerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990