Legal Opinion
Srinivas v. Picard
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 26, 2009No. 3:08-cv-01534PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nalini Srinivas (“Srinivas”) brought this action against defendants John Picard (“Picard”), Deborah Skerritt (“Skerritt”), Lynn Jacqua (“Jacqua”), Edward Flynn (“Flynn”), Cheryl Corbally (“Corbally”), Tracey Morrissey (“Tracey Morrissey”), Robert Sandella (“Sandella”), James Burns (“Burns”), Pat Howard (“Howard”), and James “Hooker” McMahon, II (“McMahon”), setting forth three claims: (i) a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for denial of substantive due process; (ii) a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- TADCO Construction Corp. v. Dormitory AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Miley v. Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013