Miley v. Housing Authority
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Dkt. ##13,17, 21]
VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Plaintiffs, Ron-dell Miley (“Miley”), motion to remand this action to Connecticut Superior Court, asserting that his claim under the Connecticut Workers’ Compensation Act is non-removable. Also before the Court is the motions to dismiss the Plaintiffs amended complaint, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, by the Defendants, the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Frascatore v. BlakeDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am. v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
- Maurer v. Town of IndependenceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Candeloro v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Carr v. The American Bottling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.