Legal Opinion
Maurice Mandel, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1970No. 19705_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Maurice Mandel, Inc. (Mandel), as a successful bidder, undertook to construct and lease to the Government a post office building in Stillwater, Minnesota, upon a site which Mandel agreed to purchase from the United States. After its bid had been accepted and a contract signed with the Government, Mandel discovered that it had under-estimated the cost of construction by relying on certain data which it claimed to be erroneous contained in and made part of the Government’s invitation to bid. Mandel incurred unanticipated construction expenses of $7,932.00 for air…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caffall Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- City of Columbia v. Paul N. Howard Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- P.T. & L. Construction Co. v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- D.F.K. Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Williams-Mcwilliams Company, in Personam, Defendants-Third-Party v. United States of America, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.