P.T. & L. Construction Co. v. State, Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
We granted certification, 105 N.J. 517 (1986), primarily to consider the respective contentions of the State and a public contractor that the decision below so far departed from settled legal principles as to call for exercise of our appellate supervision. The State contends that the Appellate Division judgment, allowing damages to the contractor for delay attributable to unexpectedly wet site conditions, erred in two respects: (1) it allowed recovery on a theory of “implied warranty” specifically precluded by the New Jersey Contractual…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bak-A-Lum Corp. of America v. Alcoa Building Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- W v. Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Tricon Kent Co. v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- PT & L. CONST. v. Madigan & HylandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Triple R Paving, Inc. v. Broward CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.