Legal Opinion

Scudero v. Todd Shipyards Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1963No. 36319PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment, entered under admiralty principles, assigning error to the application of maritime law, refusal of proposed instructions, and the admission of certain evidence.

Plaintiff, a carpenter, was injured aboard a nonself-pro-pelled barge, the Limestone, anchored in defendant’s shipyard on the navigable waters of Puget Sound. The Limestone is a 4,271 ton, 350 foot, reinforced concrete LST type craft, constructed at San Francisco in 1943 for the military service. During or after World War II it came to Tacoma, where it remained until removed to defendant’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Vogel v. Alaska Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. McDougaldMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Willapa Trading Co. v. Muscanto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API