Legal Opinion

Burns v. Cannondale Bicycle Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 27, 1994No. 920708-CAPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Associate Presiding Judge:

Plaintiff Brian Burns appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Cannondale Bicycle Company and The Bicycle Center on his products liability claim. Burns claims that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because there was a material issue of fact as to whether or not the brakes on his bicycle were defective. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTS

In July of 1986, plaintiff Burns purchased a Cannondale bicycle from The Bicycle Center in Salt Lake City, Utah. On August 16, 1986, Burns was riding the bicycle…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Nation-Wide Check Corporation, Inc. v. Forest Hills Distributors, Inc., Nation-Wide Check Corporation, Inc. v. Forest Hills Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. TurnageDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. v. Haven Hills Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Birch v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Milne v. USA Cycling Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Bass-Davis v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API