Russell v. Accurate Abatement, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Deborah Russell appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Saufley, J.) following a jury verdict in her favor. Russell contends that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury that a violation on the part of Accurate Abatement, Inc. (Accurate) of an applicable building code may be considered by the jury as evidence of Accurate’s negligence. We agree and vacate the judgment.
[¶ 2] In August 1991, Deborah Russell was a senior field technician for Balsam Environmental Consultants when she was injured in a work-place accident at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dongo v. BanksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Dumont v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Brae Asset Fund, L.P. v. AdamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Hatch v. Maine Tank Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- French v. WillmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Niedojadlo v. Central Maine Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Grover v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Ahlgren v. FabianSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Niedojadlo v. Central Maine Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998