Legal Opinion

Grover v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 2, 2003No. Docket Oxf-02-525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.

[¶ 1] William Grover appeals from a summary judgment entered in Superior Court (Oxford County, Delahanty, J.) in favor of Boise Cascade Corp. on Grover’s negligence claim. Grover claims that he was injured in 1995 when he fell from a platform with an unlatched chain guardrail in Boise’s Rumford paper mill. He argues, inter alia, that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the dangerous condition that caused his injury was “obvious” within the meaning of RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 343A (1965). We agree and vacate the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] Grover was employed as a sales engineer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Curtis v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Poulin v. Colby CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Isaacson v. Husson CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Houde v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Milliken v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grover v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. Parrish v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Tolliver v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Tolliver v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API