Legal Opinion

ING Bank N v. v. M/V TEMARA

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 13, 2018No. 16-3923(L); 16-4019(Con); August Term 2017PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide which parties are entitled to a maritime lien under the Commercial Instruments and Maritime Liens Act (" CIMLA "), 46 U.S.C. § 31301 et seq.

In 2014, the charterer of a vessel contracted with a supplier to buy bunkers (marine fuel). To fulfill its obligation, the contract supplier subcontracted with an intermediary, who, in turn, subcontracted with another entity, the physical supplier, who then delivered the bunkers. After the bunkers were delivered, but before anyone was paid, the contract supplier and the intermediary…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Coach Leatherware Co. v. Anntaylor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Bridgeway Corporation v. Citibank, Doing Business as Citicorp N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Naumovski v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. McKinney v. City of MiddletownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  3. Moreno-Godoy v. KartagenerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. Valero Marketing & Supply Co. v. M/V Almi Sun, IMOCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Kowalchuck v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API