Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bradford v. Western Irrigating Canal Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto. On May 16, 1887, The State of Kansas, upon the relation of Hon.. S. B. Bradford, the attorney general, filed its petition in this court against The Western Irrigating Canal Company, praying that the company be required to show by what authority it holds, possesses, and assumes to exercise the powers, privileges, and franchises granted to the Enterprise Irrigating Company; and that the plaintiff have judgment of ouster against the…

Read the full summary

Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto. On May 16, 1887, The State of Kansas, upon the relation of Hon.. S. B. Bradford, the attorney general, filed its petition in this court against The Western Irrigating Canal Company, praying that the company be required to show by what authority it holds, possesses, and assumes to exercise the powers, privileges, and franchises granted to the Enterprise Irrigating Company; and that the plaintiff have judgment of ouster against the defendant in the further exercise of such powers, privileges and franchises; and that the company be declared by the judgment…

1Opinion of the Court

*99Tbe opinion of the court was delivered by

IíortON, C. J.:

It is claimed that the Enterprise Irrigating Company, even if its stockholders desired it, had no right to sell all of its property, surrender its franchises, and terminate its existence, without the assent of the state; therefore, that the Western Irrigating Canal Company could not exercise the powers, privileges and franchises granted to the Enterprise Company. For the purposes of this case, we assume this to be true, and that so much of the deed of December 11, 1886, as attempts to transfer and convey the franchises of the Enterprise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Willamette Manufacturing Co. v. Bank of British ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holmes & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. Holmes & Wessell Metal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. State ex rel. Godard v. Topeka Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Virginia Cañon Toll Road Co. v. People ex rel. VivianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Bank of Fairfield v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. First State Bank of Oklahoma City v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API