Legal Opinion

Kytola v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1986No. WCB 82-06536 CA A34647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which concluded that Boise Cascade (employer) had sustained its burden of proving that claimant is no longer permanently and totally disabled. He contends that the Board applied an incorrect standard to terminate his award of permanent total disability and that employer did not sustain its burden of proof.

Claimant suffered a compensable neck injury while working as a timber faller in 1974. He previously had suffered other disabling injuries. The present claim was first closed by a determination order in July, 1975, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gettman v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Lehman v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API