Kytola v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which concluded that Boise Cascade (employer) had sustained its burden of proving that claimant is no longer permanently and totally disabled. He contends that the Board applied an incorrect standard to terminate his award of permanent total disability and that employer did not sustain its burden of proof.
Claimant suffered a compensable neck injury while working as a timber faller in 1974. He previously had suffered other disabling injuries. The present claim was first closed by a determination order in July, 1975, which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Gettman v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Lehman v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991