Legal Opinion

Lehman v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 1991No. 88-04124; CA A64276Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board finding that she is no longer permanently and totally disabled and awarding her 65% unscheduled permanent partial disability (PPD). We affirm.

Claimant compensably injured her head, neck and back in a car accident in 1972 and was awarded permanent total disability (PTD) in 1976. In May, 1987, she opened and worked in a women’s clothing store. Pursuant to ORS 656.206(5)1 and ORS 656.325(3),2 SAIF submitted documentation to the Department of Insurance and Finance, requesting reexamination of claimant’s PTD award. The Department…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bentley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Oregon State Employes Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Farmers Insurance v. HopsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Kytola v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API