Legal Opinion

In re McCartney

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1966No. Crim. No. 9944PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

-Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that her pending trial in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County is barred by the prohibition against double jeopardy and by the statute of limitations. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 13; Pen. Code, § 800.)

On November 14, 1961, the District Attorney of Los Angeles County filed an information in the superior court charging that petitioner committed murder on or about October 23, 1961. (Pen. Code, § 187.) She was convicted of second degree murder in a jury trial, but her conviction was reversed on appeal. (People v. McCartney, 222 Cal.App.2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. PrettymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API