Tannenbaum v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLupiano, J.
The amended complaint of Justine Schaefer Tannenbaum, the widow of Dr. Louis E. Schaefer, alleges three causes of action. The first cause of action is against defendant Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia (hereinafter "Provident”) and is brought by plaintiff as beneficiary of an insurance policy on the life of Dr. Schaefer issued by Provident in the amount of $200,000 because of Provident’s refusal to pay, on the death of Dr. Schaefer. The second cause of action against Provident and defendant Marvin S. Sterling (hereinafter "Sterling”), in essence pleads estoppel against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Geer v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Archer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Travelers Insurance v. PomerantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- People ex rel. Vogelstein v. Warden of the County JailNew York Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cope v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Friedman v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Ellis v. William Penn Life Assurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Cohen v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Cope v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.