State ex rel. Canter v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In his first proposition of law, appellant argues that “[flor a pre-1974 injury, the Industrial Commission may not terminate a claimant’s temporary total disability benefits on the basis that claimant’s injury had become permanent.” He contends that “* * * it was an abuse of discretion for the Industrial Commission to terminate his temporary total disability until such time as he either was capable of returning to his former position of employment or he has reached the maximum of $10,750.00, whichever is first.”2
This argument was resolved in the recent case of State, ex rel. Kirk, v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State ex rel. Hudson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Jenkins v. Indus. Comm'n of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.