Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1991No. 90-600PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant raises one issue: Does due process compel oral argument, if requested, at a hearing before the Industrial Commission, whenever new evidence is obtained? Upon review, we find that it does not.

Due process clearly entails an “opportunity to be heard.” Grannis v. Ordean (1914), 234 U.S. 385, 394, 34 S.Ct. 779, 783, 58 L.Ed. 1363, 1369. However, due process “guarantees no particular form of procedure; it protects substantial rights.” Natl. Labor Relations Bd. v. Mackay Radio & Tel. Co. (1938), 304 U.S. 333, 351, 58 S.Ct. 904, 913, 82 L.Ed. 1381, 1393; Inland Empire Dist. Council v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Lakewood City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In re Application of E. Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State Ex Rel. Jenkins v. Indus. Comm'n of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State ex rel. Didiano v. BesharaOhio Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API